Comments for Strib Letter to the Editor: Coleman's Recount at http://www.anti-strib.com , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments http://www.anti-strib.com Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:05:14 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.anti-strib.com/blog/strib-letter-to-the-editor-colemans-recount.html#comment-353 You're assuming I can't see his point of view, K-Rod... I can. He's probably a Franken guy. However, you might have missed my point... one that is an even better point if we take the assumption that Mr. Krueger backs Franken: He was not an ass about it. The point wasn't bias at all... it was the very well articulated point of view and avoidance of name-calling. This isn't about a recount. It isn't about Franken. It isn't about who won. - Badda Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:31:40 +0100 http://www.anti-strib.com/blog/strib-letter-to-the-editor-colemans-recount.html#comment-341 "Unlike Coleman, though, he thought representation was more important than haggling over a few votes that were clearly not his." Whoa there, can't you see the bias? Clearly not Coleman's? Maybe some of the double ballots, but let's be realistic here, Badda. Maybe if the recount were to be drawn out longer back in '63 we would have learned how unequal the process is and corrected it for good. - K-Rod Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:38:11 +0100