Dope smoking, hippie protestors protest something??? Comments for Dope smoking, hippie protestors protest something??? at , comment 1 to 7 out of 7 comments Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:59:57 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 Pot shots from a fellow dope-head? written by Woody , October 10, 2011 Only Woody could support Bradley Manning. Only Woody would think that this "movement" sommehow arose spontaneously- this has the stink of SEIU, AFL-CIO, Bill Ayres and Soros all over it. Only Woody could defend the (lack of) substance, measure and tone of the varied "solutions" that this silly mob of anarchists, Maoists, Che-lovers, trust-babies and general losers has proposed. "Whats interesting is the amount of effort being put forth by conservative media outlets to discredit this so called rag tag band of pot smoking, smelly, fornicating, urinating, bongo playing mob." Yeah, I agree. It's not 1/1000th of the effort put forth by the MSM, Academia, Hollywood and the Lefty Political Elite (including the VP) which has called Tea Party Ralliers: terrorists, "tea-baggers" (From CNN: "responding to, David Gergen...Anderson Cooper responded, 'It’s hard to talk when you’re teabagging.' He said this with a smirk.”... no irony there, he and Woody should know from first-hand experience), homophobes, racists, dangerous, radical, dim-witted, idiots, shallow, misinformed, fearful, astro-turfers... "Kind of makes you wonder what they are so afraid of doesn't it?" People that love this country, know the truth and danger of centralized government, the utter repeated failures of command economies, and, aren't "middle-of-the-road, patriots" like yourself, they actually know the unicorn-and-glitter crowd are the useful idiots that Lenin was counting on to help complete the worker's revolution. "Free speech with no impact? That's rarely true Bart; all speech has impact for good or ill." The impact is going to make Obama ill. Simple prediction, mark it down, the Dems are going to rue the day they embraced this "know-nothing" movement, this is '68 and '72 all over again, political realignment, with the Dems this time losing the vast majority of the independents. - jokin Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:35:46 +0100 I got it wrong. Plutocrasy; rule by Bluto from Animal House? - Nobody Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:00:18 +0100 ... Disneyland level of deep thinking. Bout right. - Sequel Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:36:52 +0100 ... One other note about that last pic: See the chick? Very pretty, yes? Now look at that pimple faced dweeb. Here's there following that chick around like a puppy. If not for commie douchebaggery he stands no shot with a hot chick. He's in it for the biscuit, the beavage, the coochie, the flapper, it's all about the snapper! [i]* liberties taken with the camel toe song[/i] - Sequel Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:34:18 +0100 Seq Plutocracy: Rule by Pluto the dog. - Nobody Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:29:19 +0100 ... Billy, what are the chances either of these 2 are even capable of defining Plutocracy? If these wastes of tuition ever got the communist revolution they clamor for, these dimwitted troublemakers would be the second wave to go into the gulag. What was it Bill Ayers said back in the day? 25 million dead in the first wave was the expected number. Omelette, broken eggs etc. It's all cool man. - Sequel Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:21:45 +0100 Well Billy, Free speach doesn't go far withouy money. The world has always been ruled by the wealthy, get over it, we don't have nor want a democracy, dude, mob rule? Not for me. - Nobody Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:10:06 +0100