What about the economy & jobs?
On the campaign trail Obama said he would bring 2 million new jobs to America. Since Obama’s policies took effect and this became his economy (from the stimulus bill forward), we have lost 4 million jobs. Now he only has to create the conditions for 6 million jobs within the next 2 and a half years. Good luck. Oh wait! I forgot about those 35 or 40 million jobs he “saved or created,” or is it more than that? Never mind about the unemployment rate or the record numbers that are unemployed (15 million plus), you gotta look at all those “saved and created” jobs, that’s really what counts. Just ask Barack, he’ll tell you!
Most people have been focused on the economy and job creation over the past year while Obama has been using that as cover to trample the constitution and socialize as much of the country as possible with no interest in the economy or jobs, just expanding big government. Extending unemployment benefits with the stroke of a pen, is hardly focusing on jobs. Sorry, that doesn’t count.
What was it? A couple of short weeks ago with Scott Brown’s election all of a sudden the usual suspects (Obama, Reid & Pelosi) decided that the economy and jobs really were the most important issues the country faced. How long did that last? 2, maybe 3 days, then its right back to ramming socialized medicine down our throats, and the economy has been put on the back burner. All I can say is, you get what you vote for.
TrackBack URI for this entry
Subscribe to this comment's feed
written by Fred , March 07, 2010
It's not as simple as you make it seem Admiral. You have to dig deeper into how the stimulus funds were misused by the recepients of these funds in creating more of the same derivative and junk money boondoggles. Saying it's all the fault of Obama, reid and Pelosi is just plain lazy and stupid on your part. Youo've got to do more digging than just listening to Mark Levin all the time. That's right I said it. Shut up, I'm educating you. XXXXXXX
"editors note - you've got to try a little harder too, Fred. The insults were unnecessary."
written by Fred , March 07, 2010
It's a Mark Levin parody and I incorrectly assumed it would be recognized.
written by Kermit , March 07, 2010
Could be because you is the only one listening to Mark Levin, Fred.
written by Nobody , March 07, 2010
Liked the "9 Men in Black " book. But he's only funny for about 30 seconds.
written by Odin , March 07, 2010
back to ramming socialized medicine down our throats,
Good example of parroting what your masters tell you to think. Interesting to see how they use the homosexual implication and the historical white fear of black male sexuality (Obama ramming it down your throat) to manipulate you. It'd also be interesting to know to what extent the phrase resonates because of repressed latent homosexuality, and the composition of the focus group(s) they tested it on.
written by Fred , March 08, 2010
Is it ram or jam. I have heard both used repeatedly. I think ram was the original.
written by Kermit , March 08, 2010
I think ram works. I also see our little totalitarian progressive is projecting again. Anyone else think he has "those" kind of dreams about Obama?
written by tswift , March 08, 2010
"Interesting to see how they use the homosexual implication and the historical white fear of black male sexuality.."
Interesting to see that the resident dim-wit is the only one to pick up on all that.
written by Kermit , March 08, 2010
Gee, ya think someone just made up "historical white fear of black male sexuality"? The only thing I fear about it is the 90% illegitamacy rate in the black community.
written by Sequel , March 08, 2010
Fred, maybe it's Rahm it through?
* * *
Baby Kieth-
fear of black male sexuality?
repressed latent homosexuality?
Wow, project much?
written by Barthélemy Barbancourt , March 08, 2010
To ram something down someone's throat has been in the vocabulary long before the Hawaiian took office. It probably has a bit to do with force feeding as in geese and liver.
They left needs to get off their obsession with racism and homosexuality. It is possible to criticize Obambi without being racist. As for homophobia, I had no idea lefties thought Obambi went that way. The time has come for everyone to admit that Obama had a terrible first year. Or to quote Palin:
"How's that Hopey Changey thing working for ya?"
For the 18% of Americans under or unemployed, not so good.
written by Odin , March 08, 2010
Gee, ya think someone just made up "historical white fear of black male sexuality"?
Google the phrase "white fear of black male sexuality" and you'll get about 90,000 hits. Are you a bubble boy in Bizarro world?
repressed latent homosexuality?
Republican leaders have repeatedly talked about Obama and his administration ramming things down their throats, Limbaugh talks about Repubs bending over and grabbing their ankles, and then there's the teabagger thing. Kinda hard not to see a homosexual theme.
Wow, project much?
It's Repub leaders who're repeatedly using political homosexual imagery. The interesting questions are why are they using it and why is it resonating with their followers? You got a better explanation than repressed latent homosexuality?
{b]t is possible to criticize Obambi without being racist.{/b]
That's true but calling him "stupid," "lazy" and "Obammy" would probably be considered racial stereotyping by most if not all objective observers. There is such a thing as valid criticism. Most of yours isn't.
