Americans just don't dig Barry anymore

Posted by: Barthélemy Barbancourt

Tagged in: Untagged 

46% of Americans say they definitely will not vote for President Obama,

Still, in the USA TODAY poll, only 38% of Americans say Obama definitely was born in the USA, and 18% say he probably was. Fifteen percent say he probably was born in another country, and 9% say he definitely was born elsewhere.

Gas prices have doubled under Obama, unemployment has stated high, deficits have gone ballistic and our nation is now involved in more wars than when Bush was in office. By any measure Barry O has been a failure.

Trackback(0)
Comments (15)add comment
Woody
...
written by Woody , April 26, 2011

I don't think Haley Barbour has your keen political insight Bart. As for the birther thing, keep trumpeting this message from the highest hilltop thru the fall of 2012. Did you come up with the evidence of the Presidents birth outside of our country yet?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42764804/ns/politics-decision_2012/



Barthélemy Barbancourt
Obama has more time to piss off more people
written by Barthélemy Barbancourt , April 26, 2011

$5 a gallon gas won't help.

As far as where Obama was born, I think he probably was born in Hawaii. I am just curious to see what is listed on his birth certificate. If you ever bothered yourself to learn the timeline of Obama's life, you'd see some very strange behavior right after Obama was born. I don't think Obama is telling the truth about who his real daddy is.



Chell
...
written by Chell , April 26, 2011

Gas prices, unemployment, and how about Obamacare? It has already cost many their health care coverage, and the individual mandate is outrageous.

Something sure seems fishy with Obama's birth certificate. It's not like he can't afford to see or copy the original, and that copy could be confirmed by some official entity (not a biased media source). So why on earth hasn't this been done?! The burden of proof does not fall on those the claim is made to, but on the one making the claim. That means it falls on Obama, since he claims to be eligible. That one official document ought to settle things.



Woody
such as...
written by Woody , April 26, 2011

shitting his diaper in some strange way? Cringing at the sight of Gerbers strained pork? Who do you think his daddy is then if not BO Sr?


Barthélemy Barbancourt
Frank Marshall Davis
written by Barthélemy Barbancourt , April 26, 2011

http://johndenugent.com/images...dunham.jpg


Woody
...
written by Woody , April 26, 2011

He's a friend of the Presidents grandfather apparently according to wiki. Are you suggesting he impregnated Ms. Dunham with the seed of a future President. Wow! I thought you were going to suggest Jeremiah Wright or something of this nature.


Barthélemy Barbancourt
Yep
written by Barthélemy Barbancourt , May 03, 2011

Barry O Sr. didn't give a crap about Stanley or baby Barry, that is obvious by his travel schedule after the birth.

Stanley needed a daddy and Barry O Sr. needed to stay in the US. His plan folded when Harvard found out he was a bigamist. Barry O Sr. also squander his tuition on shipping another girl to London for an abortion giving Harvard another reason to give him the boot.



jk noreen
Things have changed a tad at Harvard
written by jokin , May 03, 2011

Oh my! If only Barry Sr. had survived to see the "Dreams of My(Himself)" realized.
Harvard would have admitted their mea culpa of 50 years ago and made him their very own cause-celebre' by bestowing the obligatory Honorary Doctorate of Humane Letters to the end of his name. No doubt, Woody and Ed would be all for being DFTC (down for the cause).



Woody
Wow
written by Woody , May 04, 2011

Does the success of our President and our country really cause you guys this much pain and anguish? I feel for you both.


jk noreen
Admit it Woodrow...
written by jokin , May 04, 2011

your various diversionary troll-tactics and inability to stay on the topic at hand isn't working.

I find it ironic that unlike you, most here are grown-up enough to able to applaud:

1) the success and the tactics used to take OBL out (no Carter ineptitude or Clinton wimping out this time),

2) BHO in maintaining most of the foreign policy and intelligence intiatives ( & the methods used to extract that intelligence- thanks for admitting the truth, Leon Panetta!, better check with Kos and Media Matters on how to respond to this one, Woodrow!) of the previous administration that have continued to bear fruit; and still hold the President accountable for the irreparable damage he has inflicted upon the country.

Meanwhile, you were undoubtedly duplicitously screaming for:

1) the impeachment of "Bushhitler" when he originally implemented the identical policies...

2) and you also wet your pants when Bush authorized the gunning down in cold blood of the similarly unarmed ruthless butcher of innocnets, Saddam Hussein... oh wait...



jk noreen
Spin this Woodrow---- "Holder: I Hope PATRIOT Act Is Reauthorized"
written by jokin , May 04, 2011

The administration that entered office by eliminating the terminology, "war on terror" and "Islamic extremism", has now acceded to reality, but apparently (see Holder's quote below)is "downgrading" the war to merely the "fight against terrorism". Interestingly, the guy who was looking to prosecute all levels of the Bush-Cheney administration for its methodology in fighting the war, oops, fight, is now embracing the very focal legal initiative that gives the war/fight on terror its raison d'etre and was, according to BHO administration officials, critical in the success in finally hunting down OBL.

"Attorney General Eric Holder reminded members of the House Judicial Committee Tuesday that complacency is not acceptable in the fight against terrorism and pledged support for reauthorizing the PATRIOT Act.

“Although we all can be proud of Sunday’s successful operation – and we can all be encouraged by the way that thousands of Americans have joined together at this defining moment in our fight against terrorism – we cannot become complacent. This fight is far from over,” Holder said.

Holder testified before the committee to outline future plans for the Justice Department and he reiterated that the PATRIOT Act has provided the Department with the authority to acquire intelligence used to protect Americans.

“We will continue to utilize the critical authorities provided under the provisions of the Patriot Act, which I hope Congress will move promptly to reauthorize for a substantial period of time,” Holder said."

http://www.talkradionews.com/quicknews/2011/5/3/holder-i-hope-patriot-act-is-reauthorized.html

Check with your sources at Huffpo on how to proceed, hypocrisy, thy name is Woodrow.




jk noreen
Just for a little more nuance
written by jokin , May 04, 2011

As a relative newbie, you might want to check the Antistrib archives, Woodrow. The majority of the posters on this site were frequently as critical of the Bush administration as the present one, challenging positions GWB took from the Right, Left and Libertarian POVs. You won't embarrass yourself as much as you currently do with your sophomoric color-by-number line of attack.


Woody
...
written by Woody , May 04, 2011

I'd be embarrased if I had made lame and baseless speculations about the President of the United States father. Jeez, I don't recall "screaming for the impeachment of Bushhitler" I suggest you go back to the AS archives and refresh my memory on that one. I never suggested you were ardent Bush supporters. I simply pointed out an unravelling that seems to be happening amongst conservatives after the successful killing of OBL which I celebrated with relish. Care for an example? check out Judge Andrew Napolitanos ridiculous statement (from Youtube; not Huffpo) LOL. I lost count of Napolitanos hypocrisies at 17. hypocrisy, thy name as Judge Andy!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95xo9Indh2Q



jk noreen
...
written by jokin , May 04, 2011

...
written by Woody , May 04, 2011

"I'd be embarrased if I had made lame and baseless speculations about the President of the United States father."

Yeah, right, lame and baseless indeed:


http://www.scribd.com/doc/54015762/Barack-Hussein-Obama-Sr-Immigration-File

"Documents uncovered through a Freedom of Information Act request to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, formerly known as the Immigration and Naturalization Service, show that Harvard University officials worked with the INS to deny Obama’s student visa extension.
An INS investigator, M.F. McKeon, wrote on June 8, 1964: “They (Harvard officials) weren’t very impressed with him and asked us to hold up action on his application until they decided what action they could take in order to get rid of him. They were apparently having difficulty with his financial arrangements and couldn’t seem to figure out how many wives he had.”
Another memo by McKeon, dated May 19, 1964, says: “OBAMA has passed his general exams, which indicates on academic grounds he is entitled to stay around here and write his thesis; however, they are going to try to cook something up to ease him out. All three will have to agree to this, however. They are planning on telling him that they will not give him any money, and that he’d better return to Kenya and prepare his thesis at home."

No unraveling here. Not too sure about Napolitano's ideological credentials, besides the fact that you are just as guilty of playing political gotcha instead of opening your mind and joining the effort to ferret out the truth. Now, how about some mustard with that "relish" and quit being such a troll hot dog?



Woody
Written by jokin May 4, 2011
written by Woody , May 04, 2011

Written by jokin

"Documents uncovered through a Freedom of Information Act request to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, formerly known as the Immigration and Naturalization Service, show that Harvard University officials worked with the INS to deny Obama’s student visa extension.
An INS investigator, M.F. McKeon, wrote on June 8, 1964: “They (Harvard officials) weren’t very impressed with him and asked us to hold up action on his application until they decided what action they could take in order to get rid of him. They were apparently having difficulty with his financial arrangements and couldn’t seem to figure out how many wives he had.”
Another memo by McKeon, dated May 19, 1964, says: “OBAMA has passed his general exams, which indicates on academic grounds he is entitled to stay around here and write his thesis; however, they are going to try to cook something up to ease him out. All three will have to agree to this, however. They are planning on telling him that they will not give him any money, and that he’d better return to Kenya and prepare his thesis at home."

That's some riveting stuff jokin. Do you really want to go back to 1964 and playt ridiculous association games with President Barack Obamas father. You go ahead and waste your time with this nonsense. Joining the effort to ferret out what truth jokin. Napolitano truths that Obama is playing King and is a greater danger to this country than OBL. Sour grapes. I wonder what judge Tony would be saying about this if the same turn of events had occurred in 2007? I DOUBT it would be anything close to what he said last night. Same goes for a lot of these other UNRAVELING conservative opinion talkers. It's really quite humorous. LOL




Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy